| snippet:
|
Similar to the TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map, this layer seeks to identify areas in every region of the state whose characteristics have been shown by research to support positive economic, educational, and health outcomes for low-income families—particularly long-term outcomes for children. The methodology changes described below are intended to better align the map with RHNA and Housing Element goals and geographies.
This dataset has been filtered the census tracts within San Joaquin County. |
| summary:
|
Similar to the TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map, this layer seeks to identify areas in every region of the state whose characteristics have been shown by research to support positive economic, educational, and health outcomes for low-income families—particularly long-term outcomes for children. The methodology changes described below are intended to better align the map with RHNA and Housing Element goals and geographies.
This dataset has been filtered the census tracts within San Joaquin County. |
| accessInformation:
|
California State Treasurer, Uploaded by Fehr & Peers
Contact Information:
William Edmonson, GISP, Assistant GIS Manager Fehr & Peers
w.edmonson@fehrandpeers.com - 916-262-7394
Marty Delgado, GIS Analyst
m.delgado@fehrandpeers.com - 916-262-7429 |
| thumbnail:
|
|
| maxScale:
|
5000 |
| typeKeywords:
|
[] |
| description:
|
<DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>*Older versions of the COG Based opportunity maps (2022) have been archived, and are available for download in the "AFFH Version 1.0 Layers and Data Package"; section of the main HUB webpage.*The “COG Geography TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map” uses the same methodology as the TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map but incorporates the following changes: The reference geography is changed from the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) region to the Council of Governments (COG). All tracts within COGs are scored against each other. Tracts that do not fall within a COG are scored against tracts within their county. All areas are assessed at the tract level. For more on the TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map methodology, click here: </SPAN><A href="https://www.treasurer.ca.gov:443/ctcac/opportunity.asp" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>https://www.treasurer.ca.gov/ctcac/opportunity.asp </SPAN></A><SPAN>The methodology changes described above are intended to better align the map with RHNA and Housing Element goals and geographies. For example, this map scores areas against all other areas within the same COG—or the same county, for non-COG areas—rather than against TCAC-defined regions, which are different than COGs. The TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map uses TCAC regions as the reference geography because the map was specifically designed for application in the 9% LIHTC program, which ranks affordable housing funding projects against other projects in the same TCAC-defined region. In addition, this map does not designate nor adopt a distinct approach to scoring rural areas, but instead scores all areas in the same region on the same scale and at the tract level. This approach contrasts with the TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map, which scores rural areas separately—because rural affordable housing developments compete in a separate funding pool. Citation: Othering and Belonging Institute (OBI), 2023Data Source: HCD received from OBI Data received from source: Jan 2023</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV> |
| licenseInfo:
|
|
| catalogPath:
|
|
| title:
|
,TCAC_COG_Tract_2023 |
| type:
|
|
| url:
|
|
| tags:
|
["HUB Access to Opportunity","AFFH 2.0"] |
| culture:
|
en-US |
| portalUrl:
|
|
| name:
|
|
| guid:
|
|
| minScale:
|
150000000 |
| spatialReference:
|
|